Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Suzan Lamens vs Gabriela Ce Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamens vs Ce analysis and find out who is favored!
Suzan Lamens vs Gabriela Ce Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lamens 1 - 0 Ce
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 45.55% of points on their second serve, while Ce has won 43.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 58.28% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ce has won 58.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.95% and 42.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 55.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ce has saved 53.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 63.51% of matches played (W/L 47/ 27), with Ce winning 45% (W/L 27/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 176/ 113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Ce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 360/ 263), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 40/ 20), where as Ce has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.46% of matches (W/L 20/ 32). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamens winning 1 times and Ce being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Ce winning 0. The last match between Lamens and Ce was at the W15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 24-11-2020, First, Clay with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Ce have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamens winning 0 times and Ce 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Ce 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 230.53 while Ce has played against players with an average rank of 245.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ce has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 51.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ce has converted 52.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
140
Rank
131
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
485
Rank
221
High
31
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
58% (264-190)
Career Total W/L
56% (431-345)
71% (25-10)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$81,693
Career Prize Money
$26,182
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Suzan Lamens vs Gabriela Ce For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Lamens VS Ce
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Gabriela Ce |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (35/66) | 63% (38/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (17/31) | 45% (10/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/9) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (29/60) | 35% (23/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Gabriela Ce
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Gabriela Ce |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (25/10) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (51/31) | 55% (42/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (418/322) | 53% (369/330) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 76% (13/4) | 59% (17/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 73 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 135 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:33 | 1:55:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 228.83 | 217.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1335/2200) | 72% (1707/2360) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (849/1335) | 58% (985/1707) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (394/865) | 43% (281/653) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (154/301) | 53% (158/298) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1082/2248) | 49% (1109/2284) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (18/6) | 46% (12/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (24/34) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 89% (8/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 91% (10/11) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 13% (15/2) |
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Unknown Player
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Suzan Lamens
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Clara Tauson
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Gabriela Ce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Gabriela Ce
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Gabriela Ce
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anne Schaefer
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Gloria Ceschi
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Gabriela Ce
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Freya Christie
69%
(
85 of
123)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
49%
(
60 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Chiara Girelli
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Gabriela Ce
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Veronika Podrez
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Enola Chiesa
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamens Vs Ce Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Lamens are available here and Ce photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Suzan Lamens
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
